Catholics & Demonic Influence: how to avoid it…

May 18, 2012 in brown scapular, Our Lady, Real Presence, rosary, Sacraments, tradition by editor | 1 comment

“In 2005, a priest was giving a talk on the growth of satanic worship in the world and how adults and young children are becoming possessed by the devil because of the use of things such as the ouija board, saying the incantations that open the door to the demonic in “children’s books” such as the Harry Potter series, going to fortune tellers, etc, as well as persons who are cursed by others.

When someone asked the priest how to protect oneself from the demonic, besides the obvious of avoiding things that call upon satan, the priest answered, “Wear the Brown Scapular of Our Lady of Mount Carmel for protection from curses, and the devil.”   (Our Lady’s Garment, The Fatima Center, taken from: Stories of the Brown Scapular by Father Howard Rafferty, O.Carm.)

This thread is an opportunity to share stories of miracles of grace associated with Catholic sacramentals in the war against demonic influence and possession; it is also an opportunity to offer practical ideas on how to avoid demonic influence.  Father Rafferty O.Carm has suggested the Brown Scapular as one means – what about you: what would YOU suggest?

Or are you one of those modern Catholics who doesn’t think the Devil exists?   If so, enlighten us:  show us your proof…

Bishop Tartaglia Appointed To Glasgow ?

May 16, 2012 in bishops, pope benedict, tradition, Uncategorized by editor | 29 comments

The Herald understands Mario Conti will officially be replaced as the Catholic Archbishop of Glasgow within the month, with his successor expected to be the Bishop of Paisley, Philip Tartaglia.

The new Archbishop is expected to be appointed on a significant June feast day in the Catholic calendar, in keeping with the religion’s tradition. Read more

So, it’s no change in Glasgow.  Same old same old.  Or maybe you disagree?

The Desecration of First Communions…

May 15, 2012 in doctrine, Real Presence, tradition by editor | 24 comments

With all the vindications of tradition coming from Rome these days—from the liberation of the Latin Mass to the crackdown of the LCWR nuns with all their ideas of what the Catholic Church should be doing—it is little wonder that certain hyper-liberal forces in the Church are starting to become panicky, even frightened, that just maybe the Catholic laity will actually begin opening their eyes to what has been happening for the last 40-something years. Hope is one of the theological virtues, of course, and Pope Benedict XVI has given traditionalists a lot to hope for. We can see that at least superficially things  may be starting to turn around. Read more…

As children in Scotland and around the UK are preparing to make their First Holy Communion, traditional in the month of Mary, it would be interesting to know how many parishes and schools have been giving the children the option of kneeling to receive on the tongue.  I’m told that at least one parish in Glasgow has allowed children to be given the choice.  Is this, as I suspect, an exception rather than the rule?

SSPX/Rome Accord – is a split inevitable?

May 14, 2012 in bishops, doctrine, Liturgy, Papacy, pope benedict, second vatican council, sspx by editor | 80 comments

The following letters were leaked – nobody seems to know by whom  – but they appear to be authentic, not least since the authenticity of the letters has not been refuted by the authors although the leak has been condemned in an official statement

When I read these letters, my immediate response was that Bishop Fellay is right. Absolutely.  What do you think?  I’m sticking with Bishop Fellay come what may. What about you?

Letters between Bishop Fellay the other three SSPX bishops …  Please note that blogger, Aquinas, points out in the comments below, that the letters published here are merely summaries of the original letters. Aquinas has kindly posted copies of the full translations,  so you may wish to scroll down to read those instead.

 (1)  Letter of Bishops Tissier de Mallerais, de Galarreta and Williamson

The SSPX General Council has for months been considering Roman proposals for a practical accord, and this letter is to state our unanimous formal opposition to such an accord.

Of course there are honest folk on both sides, but all must admit that the Church’s authorities have separated themselves from Catholic truth and are more determined than ever to continue as such, as recent events (Assisi III) have shown.

The profound problem which Catholics face was characterised by Archbishop Lefebvre as a continuation of the papal fight against liberal Catholicism over the last two hundred years and against the attempt to reconcile the Church and the Modern World. His conclusion was that Vatican II did not just include particular errors but represented a total perversion of the mind, a new philosophy founded on subjectivism.

Benedict XVI is no better than John Paul II in this regard, as Bishop Tissier’s study of his thought (La Foi au Péril de la Raison) has shown: he puts human subjective fantasy in the place of God’s objective reality and subjects the Church to the modern world. How can a practical agreement sort out this problem?

If Benedict XVI is benevolent towards Tradition, he can afford to be since he is a subjectivist. But if liberal subjectivists can tolerate truth, they cannot tolerate truth which refuses to tolerate error; and they will not tolerate it if it condemns the Council’s doctrine. So no practical agreement can be made which will not involve gradually silencing the Society’s critique of the Council and the New Mass. The Society would then cease to oppose the universal apostasy of our time, and who would protect it from the Roman Curia and the bishops? Benedict XVI?

This slide will be inevitable, and already confession of the Faith is the exception rather than the rule. Many decent people begged Archbishop Lefebvre to make an agreement in 1988 and to extend thus his apostolate, but he refused, saying to us that it would be ambiguous and that the Society and Rome would be working in opposite directions and that this would make us rot. How can an agreement be made now and the Society not rot in contradiction?

When Rome later made benevolent gestures, the Archbishop was still wary. He feared that such actions were simply strategies to draw back as many of the faithful as possible and he told us to beware of this very danger: we have not fought for so long against errors only now to put ourselves into the hands of those who profess those errors. More than denouncing errors, the Society’s role is to oppose the Roman authorities which spread them. So will the Society now put itself into the hands of those whose obstinacy (in error) we have recent witnessed again?

Beware. You are leading the Society to an irreversible split, and if you make an accord it will have powerfully destructive forces which the Society will not be able to stand. Since the situation has not been changed and the condition of the 2006 General Chapter not met (doctrinal change in Rome), listen to our Founder who was right 25 years ago, as now. Do not make a purely practical accord.

Bishops de Galaretta, Tissier de Mallerais and Williamson.

******************************************
(2) Letter of Bishop Fellay, Fr Pfluger and Fr Nély

Thanks for your letter which describes the errors that surround us. Unfortunately, your description has two faults: lack of a supernatural view and a lack of realism

Do you still believe that the Church is the Church and that the pope is pope? Can Christ still speak through him? If he expresses a legitimate desire or decision, should we not obey, and will not God help us?

Your all too human and fatalistic attitude implies that we should not count on God’s help, his grace or the Holy Spirit. If Providence guides men’s actions, has it not been guiding the movement back to Tradition? It makes no sense to think God will let us fall now, especially since we only want to do his will and please him.

Likewise you lack realism, just as the liberals make the Council a superdogma, you are making the Council a superheresy. Archbishop Lefebvre made distinctions about liberal Catholics, and if you do not make them, your caricature of reality could lead to a true schism.

You blame all the current evils on the authorities even though they are trying to extricate the Church from them (e.g. the condemnation of the hermeneutic of continuity) and are thus not all obstinate in heresy. That is clearly false. Hence when it comes to the crucial question of making an accord, we do not come to the same conclusion as you.

We have not sought a practical accord and would prefer to carry on as we are, but Rome will no longer tolerate it. The Personal Prelature is not a trap because 2012 is not the same as 1988. There is a change in the Church’s attitude seen in BXVI’s words and acts. Young priests and bishops are supporting us and the pro-VII hierarchy is losing ground. Now, a combat within the walls is possible, though very difficult. If many still sing the glories of Vatican II, fewer and fewer think that way.

Archbishop Lefevre would have accepted what is proposed; we must not lose his sense of the Church.

Church history shows that we only recover gradually from heresies and crises, so it is not realistic to wait until everything is sorted out. If we refuse to work in this field, we fall foul of the parable of the wheat and the cockle in which Our Lord warns us that there would always be internal conflict.

Your various attitudes in recent times have made it hard for the Superior General who has been faced with your total incomprehension. Archbishop Lefebvre told us that the SSPX’s principle of unity was the Superior General but for some time you have all worked to undermine me in different ways, even with threats and publically. I wish you had tried to understand why we have thus acted.

We pray so that we might all be united for the greater glory of God and for the love of our Society.

Bishop Fellay, Fr Pfluger and Fr Nély.

******************************************

Note:  when I first heard about this leak, I decided not to publish but since these letters are all over the internet, and from dipping a toe in the blogosphere, so to speak, the majority appear to think Bishop Williamson et al are in the right.  I strongly disagree. Everything, but everything that Bishop Fellay says has the ring of Catholic truth to it – what do you think? As I said above,  I’m sticking with Bishop Fellay come what may. What about you?

 

Fatima: Your Last Chance…

May 13, 2012 in Bible, brown scapular, New World Order, Our Lady, pope benedict, rosary, Third Secret of Fatima by editor | 21 comments

This thread allows us to join with those attending the Conference in Rome 13th – 18th May, entitled “Fatima: Your Last Chance”.  The talks will be broadcast live on the internet, so we will be able to listen to them here and share our thoughts on the various issued raised during this week long Conference.

Incredibly, for political reasons, one pope after another has declined to comply with Our Lady’s request to consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart, and to reveal – in its entirety – the third part of God’s message delivered by Our Lady at Fatima, known as the Third Secret.

These and other issues – such as the global financial crisis and the agenda of the proponents of a whole New World Order - will provide plenty of food for thought and discussion during the coming week. Check out the Conference schedule and tune in for the talks when you can.  Then tell us what you think.  IS Fatima our “last chance” for world peace?

Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us!

Vendetta: Robert Williams Vs Fr Paul Kramer…

May 10, 2012 in Catholic newspapers, conscience, Our Lady, pope benedict, Third Secret of Fatima, tradition, Uncategorized by editor | 59 comments

Robert Ian Williams is the teacher from Wales who has, it appears, set out to destroy Father Paul Kramer, a retired priest who writes books and gives talks on the subject of the Fatima apparitions.  Most recently, he successfully lobbied those involved in organising (and providing the venue for) the Human Life International Conference held in London on 28 April, 2012, with the result that Fr Kramer was disinvited. Click here to read our report on this scandal, published in the May 2012 edition of Catholic Truth, scroll to pages 3-5

Previously, when Father Kramer was invited to speak at the Faith of our Fathers Conference last year, 18th June, 2011, Robert Williams suddenly began working on having the conference cancelled, alleging that Fr Kramer is “anti-Semitic”.  He then started to demand proof that Father is incardinated, that is, that he was properly ordained in a Catholic diocese, which the rest of us take for granted. See the August 2011 newsletter, pages 3-6 and page 20 and then consider: when was the last time you demanded proof from a priest as to where he was ordained/incardinated?  I am highly critical of Monsignor Basil Loftus for his error-ridden articles in both the Catholic Times and the Scottish Catholic Observer. Frankly, I’m curious about how he ended up in the Diocese of Aberdeen when he had been ”ministering” in the Diocese of Leeds.  But I’ve never asked for proof of his incardination – Catholics don’t DO that.  Robert Williams, of course, is a “convert” from Anglicanism and there are lots of ways that this latecoming to Catholicism shows. His vendetta against Fr Kramer is one of those tell-tale signs that here we do not have a cradle Catholic on our hands.

Robert Williams had absolutely nothing to do with organising the Faith of our Fathers conference although apparently he  told the Jewish Chronicle that he was “a member of Pro Ecclesia”, the organising group  Click here to read the information fed to the Jewish Chronicle by Robert Williams.

Williams was supported in his implacable campaign against Fr Kramer at that time by both the  Catholic Times and the Catholic Herald. Fr Kramer has various health problems and struggles with mobility.  The sudden publicity, with Williams savaging him on blogs and in letters published in the above named newspapers, had a devastating effect on Father Kramer’s already poor health.  I’ve known Robert Williams for years now and one of the many ironies in this vendetta waged against Fr Kramer is that I’ve never known Robert to say a good word about those newspapers. Never!  Talk about “useful idiots”. He played them like a violin. Two violins actually. Well, nobody can play two violins at the same time, but you’ll get my drift.  I suppose the editors were relieved that he’d decided to go after a traditional priest and not one of the heretics who writes in their pages.  Disgracefully, though, while the Catholic Herald at least published one letter from Fr Kramer (in a sidebar, not on the main page where Williams’ letters were featured) the editor of the Catholic Times, Kevin Flaherty, refused to allow Father the right to reply.  In the interests of justice, then, Catholic Truth published Father’s right to reply on our website.   Click here to read more

Having received a number of very interesting comments from readers about the May edition, in particular, about the article on Father Kramer’s recent insulting dismissal form the Human Life International Conference, we decided that we need to make public a few facts to try to stop people being taken in by Williams’ vendetta against this sound priest.  Father is being defamed by the misguided if not (as some have said to me) “evil” (not a judgment we are free to make) Robert Williams, so we feel we have a duty to publish the truth. Let’s examine the facts below, so that if and when Williams lobbies others to act against Fr Kramer in the future, we can point out that Robert is less than credible - to put it mildly.

1)  Robert’s claim that Father Kramer is a rogue priest is groundless.  Father answers this ignorant allegation in his right to reply letter linked in paragraph four above.

2) Robert’s claim that Father Kramer is anti-Semitic is similarly groundless. To sustain this charge, Williams has to denounce Pope Benedict’s distinction (as Cardinal Ratzinger, in his 1998 document on the Holocaust) between sinfully racial anti-Semitism and religiously dutiful anti-Jewishness (which the New York Times readily accepted, saying “it also carefully distinguishes between centuries of “anti-Judaism” as a religious teaching and the Nazis’ murderous anti-Semitism). Since the current pontiff and all Popes are necessarily anti-Judaic, are they all anti-Semites?   Williams needs to address this, and to tell us, also, whether or not he agrees with those critics who allege that the Gospels themselves are “anti-Semitic” before repeating this allegation against Father Kramer.

3) Robert tells lies. Usually I avoid alleging that anyone has “lied” – it’s more accurate, normally, to speak of someone uttering “falsehoods” rather than “lying” but in this case, unless Mr Williams doesn’t know his own telephone number, and unless he genuinely believes he’s talked with people who deny ever having heard from him, then it seems reasonable to assume that he has deliberately lied.  Allow me to explain.  In the run up to last year’s Conference in Cork, where Father Kramer was due to speak, Robert rang the key organiser.  Here’s the relevant extract from her email dated 16/9/11 which she sent to those of us involved with the conference – :

“I received a telephone call this afternoon at 5.pm from a man from Wales who told me that he rang the office of the diocese of Cork and Ross to enquire about the conference to be told that it is cancelled. He said that he was not coming to the conference but was ringing me to be helpful. He also said that they (sic) were fliers all over the churches to say that the conference is cancelled. (He did not want to give his name initially.).  Is this the so called now famous Robbie Williams?  He also gave me his telephone as xxxxxx7059  but when I checked my telephone this no. came up;  xxxxxx0321 – (full numbers withheld by editor)” END OF EXTRACT.

Note: (a)  the traced telephone number is Robert’s number.   I’ve had it in my address book for years.  (b) the organiser later told me that the Diocese of Cork & Ross had no record of any call from anyone about the Conference and had not told anyone it was cancelled – in fact, they didn’t know anything about our planned Conference.

Could there possibly be a more damning  confirmation of every charge that has ever been laid against Robert Williams? Shocking doesn’t cover it. What sort of personality even contemplates, never mind actively carries out such clandestine/mendacious sabotage? Answer: the same one that subverted the PEEP conference by betraying his then-friend Daphne McLeod to the Jews, and who continues to victimise Fr Kramer. One can only wonder what on earth the Herald and the Times are thinking – giving a regular forum to such a person?

There’s plenty more I – and others – could say about Robert Ian Williams, some of it even more disturbing, but I think that what’s here is sufficient to kick start this blog discussion, the aim of which is essentially two-fold:  to correct the falsehoods being spread abroad about Fr Kramer, and to consider whether, in fact, there is anything that might be done to help Robert Williams recognise the damage he is doing, not just to Father Kramer’s reputation but to his own.

The Mystery of the New Scots Auxiliary Bishop…

May 8, 2012 in bishops, doctrine, Scotland, tradition by editor | 34 comments

Scots Catholics have been puzzled for a while at the lack of episcopal appointments to fill the current vacancies in Scotland – notably a replacement for Archbishop Conti of Glasgow.

Yet, out of the blue, we have a new auxiliary bishop appointed in Edinburgh, presumably as a result of clergy concern that the Cardinal, Keith Patrick O’Brien, is so often away from the archdiocese, visiting countries abroad.

In any case, we extend our usual welcome to the new bishop, Mgr Stephen Robson, in the hope that he will act to restore the traditional Faith while not exactly holding our breath.

If you can shed any light on the mystery of this appointment, please do.  Otherwise, give us your thoughts on the current state of the Church in Scotland and what, if any, difference you think the new auxiliary bishop might make.

SCO Letters – Reading Between The Lines…

May 5, 2012 in Catholic newspapers, discrimination, Scotland, Uncategorized by editor | 28 comments

Liz Leydon, Editor of the Scottish Catholic Observer (Scotland’s only national Catholic newspaper) has been known to butcher letters, effectively re-writing them, presumably to keep her readers in the dark about matters she’d much prefer not to publicise.  The “gay” Masses in St Simon’s parish, Glasgow, are a case in point. She’s also – it seems – at pains to suppress the fact that the same priest who accommodates these “gay” Masses (Fr Willy Slavin) plays a leading role in the production of the dissident journal, Open House.

I decided to post this topic today, because the most recent example of Liz Leydon’s censorship is in this weekend’s Scottish Catholic Observer (SCO).  And this most recent example, is a letter submitted by me, which Ms Leydon has effectively taken it upon herself to rewrite.  Below, is the butchered letter, as it appears in the paper this weekend.  Underneath that, is my original letter.  Work out if, reading between the lines, Scots Catholics will be able to work out that Fr Slavin permits Masses for homosexuals, lesbians, bi-sexuals, & transgender people  in his Glasgow parish and/or that he plays a leading role in (both editing and writing) the dissident journal, Open House.

Butchered Letter published in the SCO Friday 4 May

Kevin McKenna accuses Catholic Truth of “hating” Fr Willy Slavin ((Celebrating Catholics in Scottish Life, SCO, 20/4/12).

Mr McKenna offers no evidence for his claim. The Catholic Truth Scotland team hates no-one.  (Ed: I never refer to this newsletter/team as Catholic Truth Scotland. That is not our name, merely our website address for technical reasons.)

I can only assume that Mr McKenna has read our newsletter reports on (certain) Masses at St Simon’s parish, followed by refreshments in the parish socialising centre, “Cafe Simon”.

Or perhaps Mr McKenna has read our reports on Fr Slavin’s (links to) Open House?  Whatever the source of Mr McKenna’s attack on Catholic Truth, there is no “hatred” for any individual expressed in any of our newsletters.

If Mr McKenna wishes to stand by his claim, then the onus is on him to provide solid evidence.  Editor, Catholic Truth.

*****************************************

Original Letter Submitted For Publication Sunday, 22 April

Dear Editor,

Kevin McKenna accuses Catholic Truth of “hating” Fr Willy Slavin (Celebrating Catholics in Scottish Life, SCO, 20/4/12).

Mr McKenna offers no evidence for his libellous claim, which is entirely baseless.  The Catholic Truth team hates no-one.

I can only assume that Kevin McKenna has read our newsletter reports on the Masses which, as far as we know, continue to be provided for homosexuals and their partners at St Simon’s parish, followed by refreshments in the parish socialising centre, “cafe Simon”. If these “gay” Masses are now discontinued, Fr Slavin may wish to let us know,but certainly, having attended one of them, I can personally  testify to the fact that they were provided, and clearly this had to be courtesy of the Parish Priest, Fr Willy Slavin.

Or perhaps Mr McKenna has read our reports on Fr Slavin’s leading role in the dissident journal Open House? Whatever the source of Mr McKenna’s ill-advised attack on Catholic Truth, there is no “hatred” for any individual expressed in any of our newsletters.

I expect it is too much to ask for an apology for this unwarranted attack on our integrity, but I trust that, at least, this short letter will be published to set the record straight.  If Kevin McKenna wishes to stand by his uncharitable claim, then the onus is on him to provide solid evidence.  Editor, Catholic Truth, www.catholictruthscotland.com

*****************************************

Why, in your view, is the editor of the Scottish Catholic Observer determined to hide the fact from her readers that there is an LGBT Mass being provided in the archdiocese of Glasgow?  Wouldn’t a truly professional journalist want to make sure that  the Scottish Catholic population – and certainly those living in the archdiocese of Glasgow – were informed about this astonishing provision of Masses for homosexuals and their partners?

Given that Kevin McKenna said openly in his column (22 April) that he regarded Fr Slavin to be a “saint” because he is “hated by those dreadful zealots at Catholic Truth” doesn’t Liz Leydon have a duty to make sure her readers are fully informed about why Catholic Truth has criticised Fr Slavin, so that they can make up their own minds about the reliability (or otherwise) of McKenna’s opinion?

Reading my butchered letter will, I believe, only raise eyebrows.  What on EARTH are “certain Masses” and what the dickens does it mean to say that Fr Slavin has “links to” Open House?  Most readers won’t have heard of Open House so, absent the knowledge that this is a dissenting journal, they won’t be able to work out the significance of Fr Slavin’s “links” to it.

One more thing. Easily, the longest letter on the page today is a letter on the subject of Religious Education (RE) in schools  from a humanist claiming: “we have no wish to attack RE.” That, of course, is a blatant falsehood (they’ve been on local news bulletins this past week arguing that RE should be removed from schools) yet Ms Leydon clearly had no problems publishing it. This letter, from a disingenuous (to say the least), humanist seems to have made it through the censorship process uncut. In short, Leydon publishes falsehoods (quite likely deliberate lies)  and suppresses the truth, without blinking an eyelid - what does that tell us about her lack of integrity?  A rhetorical question if ever there was one.

Short of launching a course in Reading Between The Lines of Letters Pages, though, there’s not a lot we can do about it.  Is there?

Cardinal Brady “Misrepresented” by BBC …

May 2, 2012 in bishops, ireland, Morality by editor | 68 comments

Cardinal Brady has issued a statement following a BBC documentary:

“On Tuesday 1 May 2012, the BBC ‘This World’ series broadcast a programme entitled ‘The Shame of the Catholic Church’ on the BBC Northern Ireland network. In the course of the programme a number of claims were made which overstate and seriously misrepresent my role in a Church Inquiry in 1975 into allegations against the Norbertine priest Fr Brendan Smyth… With others, I feel betrayed that those who had the authority in the Church to stop Brendan Smyth failed to act on the evidence I gave them. However, I also accept that I was part of an unhelpful culture of deference and silence in society, and the Church, which thankfully is now a thing of the past.” Cardinal Seán Brady Click here to read Cardinal O’Brady’s statement in full…

Note, this BBC documentary is to be broadcast across the UK tonight, 2 May, on BBC 2 at 9pm.

Is anyone surprised that the BBC failed to use the evidence supplied by Cardinal Brady?  Could it be clearer that the media are simply out to get the Catholic Church on this (and just about anything else they can think of?) That is, EXCEPT that for which the bishops are truly culpable and responsible before God – the apostasy that has spread like wildfire this past fifty years and which has led to this shocking child abuse.  You just don’t get fully believing, zealous Catholic priests abusing children.  Reflect.

“Gay” Bullying – IS it a scam?

May 2, 2012 in homosexuality, International, marriage by editor | 13 comments

The “Bullying” Scam

vort-2012-05-01

Click here to view video - script below…

Hello everyone and welcome to The Vortex where lies and falsehoods are trapped and exposed. I’m Michael Voris.

If you haven’t noticed .. the way to advance your cause .. regardless of what it is .. it to play the victim. Even if you’re not actually a victim. Even if you have to disregard other legitimate victims in the process of making yourself be the biggest victim. And even if you have to victimize others to promote your own victimhood.

And you can be sure … that if you have a pitch to make about being a victim that happily corresponds to the liberal modernist secularist atheist progressive movement inside and outside the Church .. especially in the media .. you van rest assured that you will be canonized for your victimhood. Case in point .. the pure hypocrisy and double standard of the school-bullying initiatives that are being hailed as the most important social movement since abolition. Everywhere .. on playgrounds across the nation .. according to the homosexual lobby .. gay children are being bullied and driven to suicide.

First of all .. does an immature teen or even pre-teen for that matter .. really have a grasp of what his or her sexual identity is when its that’s confused? So children .. many of them fatherless .. who have the slightest doubt about their own sexuality or sexual identification are encouraged by radical militant homosexual groups to stand up and declare loud and proud something that many times may not even be the case.

But even if it is the case .. it still does not excuse the victimization of these young people by the homosexual movement .. to use them as propaganda in their culture war. These young people need the solace of strong capable men and guidance that they are not condemned to the destructive lifestyle of homosexuality.

But instead .. they get no guidance and get propped up as excuses for why men having sex with men and women with women should be viewed as perfectly normal and all those who disagree are hate-filled monsters.

So they are more than happy to trot out this canard of caring under the guise of antibullying laws. If they are so concerned about children being bullied .. where are the efforts to throw all those playground bullies into jail who call other kids Fatty, or zit-Face.

What about the abuse heaped on the stoner crowd? And all those dumb-jocks .. they sure get laughed about and mocked behind their backs quite frequently. Of course .. the nongay yet still socially inept nerds and social misfits who’s mommies dress them funny .. they get a lot of bullying as well. Where are all the laws and stampedes up and down the halls of congress for them?

Heck .. at least a so-called gay kid can go online these days and get loads of “help” and “encouragement” in secretly lusting after the Quarterback from a bunch of older men who did the same as kids .. but pity the poor zit-faced nerd who no one sits with in the lunch room .. INCLUDING THAT COOL GAY KID CROWD and all the wanna be popular girls who hang around them .. they wouldn’t caught dead with THAT kid.

And of course .. if you go through some schools today .. you will find that it is increasingly the case that kids who believe in Our Blessed Lord .. are experiencing some bullying themselves .. but in their case .. it’s not from other kids as much as it is from teachers .. principals and school boards.

They’re being told to switch out of their Jesus t-shirts .. to put way those rosaries .. bibles .. and crosses. Which of course stand to reason since they’ve been told by judges and congressmen they can’t pray at graduations .. mention God or religion in the classroom .. or do anything else that even hints at acknowledgment of a Supreme Being .. unless of course it’s Allah.

And if you think that’s an exaggeration .. all you need to do is listen to the hate filled .. and this time the term is applied correctly .. for once .. HATE filled screed leveled by self-described gay boy anti-bullying champion Dan Savage who stood in front of a crowded auditorium of high school students and absolutely let in to Christian kids .. calling them quote = pansy-asses.

And he was just getting warmed up. Close to a hundred kids were literally bullied out of the auditorium by mister anti-bullying himself in the most overt example of bullying you could imagine in a school setting.

Picture it .. An adult speaker at a high school conference begins a tirade against helpless students who can do absolutely nothing to defend themselves and are heckled by him as they leave in quiet protest. Savage is an expert on bullying all right!

Only in the topsy-turvy world of so-called gay rights and homosexuality .. could a selfdescribed opponent of bullying stand up and bully a bunch of Christian kids and this be seen as right.

I wonder if it ever occurred to Savage .. who bears an appropriate name by the way .. if any of the kids he was heckling and insulting were homosexual themselves .. but just agree with God that the orientation is wrong and have made the commitment to live pure and chaste lives.

Now .. let’s imagine that clubs like that started forming on various school campuses around the country. And let’s imagine that THOSE kids started getting bullied. DO you really think the militant homosexuals who come to the defense of kids who try to live chastely according to their religious beliefs. Not a chance.

Heck .. as far as we know .. Savage already attacked some of them .. at least in theory. No .. this bullying garbage isn’t about caring for kids .. some of whom only .. may perhaps .. who only THINK they are gay. It’s about using them as political tools to  advance a perversity and to force by weight of law to succumb and submit. The campaign is part of a much larger campaign of Militant Gay Terrorism.

They portray children as victims who deserve much greater protection from bullying than other kids .. kids who exist in much greater numbers and undergo much more intense bullying.

They use isolated cases here and there .. which again are far far fewer in number than the other countless episodes of bullying that go on in school lunchrooms, bus rides and playgrounds everyday. And they use these cases to push for laws that will be another brick in the wall of the monument they are constructing to force everyone to accept homosexual sex as normal.

The gay kids .. or those who think they are gay .. really are victims .. but not of who they think.

GOD Love you. I’m Michael Voris. 

So?  IS “gay” bullying a scam?  Just who ARE the real “gay” bullies?

« Older entries