catholic schools

You are currently browsing the archive for the catholic schools category.

There does come a day when you actually finish home schooling your children. I have reached that day this year with our daughter’s graduation from high school. As I work my way through the empty ‘school desk’ syndrome and begin to look at myself anew and consider my possibilities for the future, I can’t help but reflect back on what I found most important in our experience.There were many days when home schooling was a test of endurance, patience and faith, and other days when I turned it into race and almost burned out, but mostly I managed to keep the pace even, trying not to pass up too many rest stops. I had to completely remake our home life. I learned the Faith, and also received the Catholic education I was never given – both of these gifts were worth the work of home schooling and I doubt that they would have happened without it.   Click here to read more

We’ve never had a thread on the topic of home-schooling before, so for those who are concerned about the state of a Catholic Education System that lets heretics like laisized priest, Professor Thomas Groome loose to malform the teachers, home-education is an option you may wish to consider. As you will see from the above article, however, it is not at all plain sailing, so the question for discussion has to be – is it worth the hassle?

Tags: , ,

Update: 9 June, 2010 - a group of Catholic Truth readers visited the Pauline Books and Media shop in Royal Exchange Square, with leaflets warning about the dangerous writings of Thomas Groome, whose books were featured in a prominent window display. Scroll down to read the editor’s comment on this lunchtime venture.

A reader emailed today to tell us that the Pauline Sisters  in Glasgow have been busy arranging a window display in their bookshop to promote Professor Thomas Groome’s books. The Sisters know that the Archbishop (Mario Conti) will be perfectly happy with their latest initiative to – literally – “sell”  heresy, and the Archbishop can rest easy knowing that nobody in the Vatican will bother their heads one little bit. The brass necks are now of giraffe proportions.

To refresh memories, click here to read the previous thread on Professor Groome, now closed to comments.  I’ve copied and pasted below, the final comment from blogger Augustine (who happens to be the young man who wrote to all the priests in three dioceses:  the Archdiocese of Glasgow, Motherwell and Paisley, in an attempt to prevent them from attending the planned Lecture of Professor Groome in St Aloysius College, Glasgow, a few weeks ago.) Thankfully, the volcanic ash saw to it that there were no planes available to the land the “ex”-priest, Groome on Scottish soil, so the Lecture didn’t take place after all.

But, fancy the Daughters of St Paul – as was, before their feminist switch to “Pauline” bookshop – advertising his books so blatantly in their shop window? Groome is a very public dissenter, most notably with reference to the ordination of women.  Tell us what you make of this scandalous book display once you’ve read Augustine’s  comment on his correspondence with Professor Groome, who argues  that Catholic teaching on male-only priesthood is not set in stone. Click here to find out why he’s plain wrong…

It occurs to me that the two readers who recently asked me to post threads on two specific topics can have their dreams come true on this thread. One reader asked for a thread on practical responses to scandals whether they occur in parishes or other venues within a diocese –  a lecture to be delivered in a Catholic school by a known heretic, springs to  mind!  The other reader asked for a thread on humility.  St. Bernard defines humility: “A virtue by which a man knowing himself as he truly is, abases himself.”  And St. Thomas: “The virtue of humility,” he says, “consists in keeping oneself within one’s own bounds, not reaching out to things above one, but submitting to one’s superior” (Summa Contra Gent., bk. IV, ch. lv, tr. Rickaby). Seems to me that none of the church-people involved in the Groome scandal are submitting to the teaching of the Church but, conversely, display an arrogance, a pride that is extremely dangerous to their spiritual welfare.

So, feel free to explore all the issues surrounding this latest development in the Saga of the Scandalous Professor, but let me know folks, if you still want separate threads on “Catholic Action” and “Humility” – Catholic Truth at your service! Feel free to let me know your preference, by your chosen method, at your convenience, she said, oozing humility…

Blogger, Augustine writes…

Professor Groome contacted me by post last month and strongly requested that I “restore [his] good name in Scotland”. Since then we have been emailing back and forth about the subject in question i.e. the reservation of priestly orders to men. It’s quite clear to me that he simply doesn’t accept the Church’s teaching on this point. In fact, in one of his emails to me he stated:

However, no theologian that I know – and I work with some 60 of them at Boston College – would say that this is indisputedly an infallible teaching. The Pope, acting as the successor of Peter, i.e. speaking ex cathedra and in the name of all the bishops of the world, has never declared this an infallible dogma of Catholic faith.

Mr. Keane incorrectly insists that the Catholic Church’s negative decision on the ordination of women is an infallible teaching. This indeed was the position of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) as stated “Responsum ad Dubium” of Oct 28, 1995 and signed by then Cardinal Ratzinger. But theologically the CDF cannot teach infallibly on its own authority and its claim that Pope John Paul II in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis was merely confirming a teaching already taught infallibly by the bishops of the world has been challenged by many respected and faithful Catholic theologians. I repeat, a teaching of the ordinary magisterium cannot be considered infallible unless the Pope explicitly states so; this was a key condition for infallibility laid down by the First Vatican Council (1870).

I think Professor Groome seems very fixed on the idea that only ex cathedra statements possess the note of infallibility. In fact, Lumen Gentium 25 talks about the infallibility of the ordinary and universal Magisterium under certain conditions. Which is exactly whence the late Holy Father drew the teaching that priestly orders are to be reserved to males.

In fact, as far as I see it – and someone please correct me if I am wrong – we can say that certain doctrines are to be ‘held definitively’ and, thus, are infallible even though they have not been elevated to the level of a formal dogma. This – it seems to me – was the import of the CDF’s Commentary that came out 4 years after Ordinatio Sacerdotalis. End

Tags: , , , ,

Take a look at these videos, which will make you smile – small Irish children in school talking about various bible stories.  Hilarious.  But notice, they have a good knowledge base (if the chronology is sometimes confused!) These pupils were being taught on the cusp of the crisis, so there are interesting issues of Catholic education to be considered and you might, justifiably, wonder how contemporary pupils would fare when invited to “tell the men from the television” about the Faith.

But, really, this is one of those “miscellaneous” threads – partly for fun, to give us a bit of light-hearted relief in the midst of a terrible Church crisis.

Enjoy! 

Tags: ,

In a remarkable interfaith gesture, Fifth Annual Catholic Diocesan Youth Rally held at Reno (Nevada, USA), involving Catholic teenagers from various parts of Nevada, heard from area Muslim-Hindu-Buddhist-Jewish leaders.

Catholic teenagers listened intently in the chapel of Bishop Manogue Catholic High School to Muslim imam Abdulrahim Barghouthi, Hindu statesman Rajan Zed, Buddhist priest William S. Bartlett, and Jewish rabbi Teri E. Appleby, explaining the tenets of their respective faiths, highlighting similarities. It ended with recitation of Gayatri Mantra (most sacred mantra of Hinduism from the oldest scripture Rig-Veda, dating to around 1,500 BCE) by Zed.
Click here to read more

And don’t think this phenomenon of providing opportunities for pupils to actively participate in the worship of  false gods is restricted to Catholic schools in the USA – I had an email a couple of days ago from a parent here in Scotland, expressing shock that his daughter was being taught to sing the praises of the Hindu god Shiva.

Let’s be clear:  we’re not talking about pupils being informed about other beliefs. We’re talking about Catholic schools actively promoting false religions. Put this together with our discussion about the invitation to public dissenter, ex-priest, Professor Tom Groome to lecture priests, teachers and catechists of the Archdiocese of Glasgow and you won’t be surprised to discover why we’re asking the question about parental duty.

Parents have a duty to protect and nurture the Faith of their offspring. Catholic schools share this responsibility (with the consent of the parents) but if the schools fail to teach the Faith and, instead, promote false religions, what can and should parents do about the situation?

In short, if you can think of one single reason why parents should continue to send their children to a Catholic school, whether in Scotland, England,  the USA, or anywhere else, we’d like to hear from you. Or, do parents now have a clear duty to withdraw their children from Catholic schools, to prevent malformation in the Faith?

Tags: , ,

“A Catholic faith school can say to their pupils: ‘We believe as a religion contraception is wrong.’ But what they can’t do is therefore say that they are not going to teach contraception to children, how to access contraception, or how to use contraception. What this changes is that for the first time these schools cannot just ignore these issues or teach only one side of the argument.

“They also have to teach that there are different views on homosexuality. They cannot teach homophobia. They must explain civil partnerships. They must give a balanced view on abortion. They must give both sides of the argument. They must explain how to access an abortion. The same is true on contraception as well.”

He added: “To have the support of the Catholic Church and Archbishop Nichol [sic] in these changes is, I think, very, very important, is a huge step forward…Fr Tim Finigan, a parish priest and blogger in Blackfen, Kent, said: ‘Catholic schools cannot give information about how to access the local abortion clinic since this would be formal co-operation in a grave evil.’”
Click here to read the entire article

Tags: , , , , ,

St Aloysius has organised a special study day on 20th April with the world (in)famous dissenter, Professor Thomas Groome from the Jesuit University, Boston College, U.S.A.

The study day is titled, “To Teach as Jesus Did: Handing on the Faith in the 21st Century”. This day is for priests, teachers and catechists and is being “supported” by the Archdiocese of Glasgow and the Scottish Catholic Education Service, which, we presume, means they’re paying for it using your money. Else, who’s paying for Professor Groome’s flights and accommodation? And the rest?

The cost is £75 so it’s not inexpensive to hand your Faith away – still, the clergy and teachers can afford it.

In the evening Professor Groome will talk in St. Aloysius’ Church at 7.30pm on “What Keeps Us Catholic?”. This lecture is free. At least they’re not charging the rest of us, to rob us of our beloved Catholic Faith.  Something, I suppose…

The irony of the title of Professor Groome’s evening lecture will not be lost on those who understand his systematic and very public dissent from many Church teachings. A dissent which you can read about if you click here

As you’ll have noted, in the link above, Archbishop Pell banned Groome’s books from being used in Catholics schools over there in Aussie-land, and forbade their sale in his churches. No such concerns here, though, since Groome’s books, we’re reliably informed, have been on the shelves of our teacher training college in Glasgow for quite some time.

We urge you to write to Archbishop Conti to complain about this misuse of funds, not to mention his abuse of your trust.  The buck stops with him. It’s his archdiocese.  He has approved this scandal which no doubt includes the use of Church funds to pay for it. We need to probe that (and we will) but there seems little, if any doubt, that “supporting” these scandalous lectures on how to lose the Catholic Faith (or what’s left of it in Glasgow) means that the archdiocese is coughing up the cash.

There are still, incredibly, some parents who send their children to Catholic schools in the expectation that they will be taught the Faith or, minimally, not be given a distorted version of it.  To pay for a man to come from the other end of the world to preach heresy and dissent, or to, in any way whatsoever, “support” his efforts, is to quite deliberately betray that trust. Let us be clear. The ridiculous claim that the archbishop probably doesn’t know about Groome’s dissent, just doesn’t stand up to examination – in that case, he’s in the wrong job:  it’s his duty to know. Everybody else knows. Nobody else is that ignorant. Thank goodness for “everybody” and “nobody” – don’t know where we’d be without them. Whatever which way you look at it, Archbishop Conti is slap, bang, wollop in the middle of the circle where it says “blame”.

Without delay, please write to:

Archbishop Mario Conti, 40 Newlands Road, Glasgow, G43 2JD

And don’t forget to tell him that you will not put another penny in any collection plate in the archdiocese, until you have his personal assurance that this proposed lecture(s) will not take place. The sheer cheek of it.  The brass neck! 

Tags: , ,

A Scots priest contacted us recently to urge discussion on our blog about the forthcoming Ad Limina visit.  He is very keen that the laity write to the Vatican well in advance of the Scottish Bishops’ Ad Limina visit, which is to take place during the first week in February. 

There’s no shortage of problems in the Scottish Church for which the bishops must be held to account.  This thread should serve to remind us all of the many scandals in the Church in Scotland at the present time. Many of them have been debated on this blog – like, for example, the case of the American priest, Father David Cotter, serving in the Diocese of Paisley, who announced on Radio Scotland that he supported the anti-life policies of the then presidential candidate, now President Barack Obama, for whom, Father Cotter cast his vote by post.  Click here to read that thread

Sadly, there are plenty more scandals in the local Church – Fr Cotter’s support for a pro-abortion, pro-gay rights politician whom he helped achieve the most important and powerful governmental post in the world, is but one cog in a very big wheel of dissent and scandal.  

But enough from me – here’s the piece submitted by the Scottish priest who asked for this thread:

In approximately 8 weeks the Scottish Bishops will be going to Rome for an Ad Limina visit, something which normally happens every 5 years but which due to the change of Pope has been 7/8 years since last happening.

At this the bishops will be asked to give an account of themselves, their actions, events in and plans for their Diocese and the Catholic Church in Scotland.

Over recent years, especially the last 2/3/4 years we have repeatedly seen actions by bishops which were not in obedience to Papal instruction/wishes, Roman Curia/Commission’s instruction/directions. Action/s have been taken by individual bishops/the Scottish Bishops Conference which have been disobedient and so failed to be part of the “One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church”.  As a result we’ve witnessed some actions/policies which are clearly schismatic.  Here’s a brief overview of the goings on in the Church in Scotland.

In Glasgow, there was a murder in a Glasgow church.  The priest, if you remember, was giving out rooms in the parish house.   This murder of a young girl in a  Catholic Church made headlines that brought the Scottish Church into disrepute.  Bloggers should send details of this scandal to Rome, enclosing newspaper cuttings if possible.

In  Dundee, the Vicar General had girl friends over a period of 18 years.  Again, national headlines resulted.  Headlines that should be sent to Rome.

In Glasgow there was a negative response to the papal Moto Proprio, Summorum Pontificum, when Archbishop Conti stated that priests ordained after 1970 would not get permission to say the Tridentine Mass; this was outright rejection of the permission Pope Benedict had given to every priest in the world.

In Summorum Pontificum, bishops were told to encourage younger priests to learn the old Latin Mass, help them, so that its beauty and reverence would not be lost to future generations. Has any Scottish bishop done this? So far, one only hears of certain bishops’ deliberate suppression of the old Latin Mass, not their encouragement.  Rome needs to be told that Summorum Pontificum has been mostly ignored in Scotland.

Then there is the increasingly common practice of priests administering the Sacrament of Confirmation instead of the Bishop.  Yet, in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1994 we read:

1313 In the Latin Rite, the ordinary minister of Confirmation is the bishop.

Although the Bishop may for grave reasons concede to priests the faculty of administering Confirmation, it is appropriate from the very meaning of the Sacrament that he should confer it himself, mindful that the celebration of Confirmation has been temporally separated from Baptism for this reason. Bishops are the successors of the apostles. They have received the fullness of the sacrament of Holy Orders. The administration of this sacrament by them demonstrates clearly that its effect is to unite those who receive it more closely to the Church, to her apostolic origins, and to her mission of bearing witness to Christ.

What grave circumstances have there been each year that bishops in certain dioceses confer this sacrament only 3-5 times? But they will go to Ecumenical services more than 5 times over the year!   Rome needs to be told about this.  If your child was ordained by a priest instead of the Bishop, write to tell the authorities in Rome so that they can raise the matter with the Bishops.

In 2000 in Scotus Seminary the Scottish bishops built a chapel. In it was placed a “crucifix”, claimed to be a work of art, which was strands of metal formed together to represent Christ’s body on the cross, naked, which looked like the leftovers from the previous night’s spaghetti bolognaise – it did not in any way show the real suffering and sacrifice of Christ on the Cross for the forgiveness of our sins. This was, in fact, a naked man who had modelled for the “cruciform”.   Students were faced with this “cruciform” every time they entered the chapel. Imagine trying to pray with that naked man hanging above the altar.  Little wonder that the seminary closed.

In this Chapel right up to closure students were discouraged from kneeling in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament, yet from the Year of the Eucharist came clearly the message that we urgently needed to get back to an awareness of the Real Presence, something shown by reverent actions. Again, I say, little wonder that we have no seminary in Scotland.   Remind  Rome of this background to the closure of Scotus.  

The  highly unsuitable, virtually doctrine-free “Alive O” Religious Education curriculum was implemented by the Scottish Bishops Conference late 80s/early 90s while Ireland was waiting for Rome to give approval to it; such approval was never given, in fact the opposite – according to Rome it is not suitable for teaching Catholic pupils and yet the Scottish Bishops have it in our Catholic Schools.  Why?   We need to tell Rome that children in Catholic schools are being denied a solid Catholic education.

Are things so bad here because the papal nuncios are part of the Bishops Club, members of the Magic Circle in the country to which they are posted; not wanting to rock the boat, therefore not reporting matters to Rome which are a betrayal of Catholic Faith/Teaching/Principals?  Ask Rome why the papal nuncios are not passing on the truth about the state of the Church in Scotland.

If Bishops are not acting in obedience to Rome, shouldn’t this be reported by a papal nuncio?  This certainly does not seem to happen in our present times – bishops allowing/advocating masses for homosexual groups to make them feel at ease, where there is no attempt to make clear they must repent and sin no more, is but one present day example in the UK.  Masses for the Quest organization have been held in a Glasgow parish (Ed: we reported this in the newsletter at the time) so this is clearly a scandal that should be reported to Rome.

Within the last 2/3 days we have seen Rome’s/Pope Benedict’s outrage and betrayal, something brought about by Bishops in Ireland not properly and truthfully addressing matters. Why was Benedict/John Paul not informed of such matters?  Unless Rome is kept informed about the reality of the local churches, similar scandals could break out elsewhere, including Scotland.

Rome, must act in an authoritative way when Bishops do not act in unity with the “One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church” but they can only know about these scandals if we tell them.   They seem to think Scotland is in a good condition.  We must correct their misconceptions.

The above are but some issues that you may wish raised and investigated at the Scottish Bishops Ad Limina visit to Rome this February; you may have others of your own. If so they should be raised with/made known to the appropriate congregations/authorities in Rome within the next 3-4 weeks (they will need them by early January so that questions raised may be looked into prior to the February meeting) so bloggers are encouraged to write without delay to the relevant Congregations in  Rome.  END

 Editor:  Click here for the Vatican addresses and get those keyboards working.  Costs very little to post a letter to Rome, so no excuses. 

Click on ‘comments’ to post questions and comments.  If you’d like help with your letter email us via the website and we’ll gladly advise.

Friends paid tribute to Natalie Morton, the 14-year-old schoolgirl who died shortly after being given the cervical cancer vaccine

Click here to read The Telegraph report   

Today, I sent the following e-mail to Peter Kearney, at the Scottish Catholic Media Office:

Attention of Peter Kearney

Would you confirm that the Scottish Bishops intend to continue their policy of permitting this untested (and – in a number of cases – proven to be lethal) injection to be administered to all girls in Scottish Catholic schools?    I ask, obviously, in light of the reports, yesterday, of the death of the 13 year old victim in England because I’d like to update, with factual information, our previous blog threads on the topic.

Click on links below to read our previous blog posts on this topic…

August 3, 2008   August 15, 2008   August 25, 2008  September 25, 2008      

Are the Bishops now going to do what Coventry local Council have done, and put an end to this experiment on little girls?

I await your reply with interest.   

Editor, Catholic Truth

If and when I receive a reply, I’ll let you all know.  In the meantime, tell us what you think.   SHOULD the Scots Bishops insist on an end to this experiment on child-girls in  Catholic schools?

Tags: ,

Click on the  link below to read the September edition.  Comments welcome.

http://www.catholictruth
scotland.com
/September

Newsletter09.pdf

Tags: ,

It’s dawning on the moderns that the Vatican II Project has resulted in a dramatic decline in the  numbers of faithful.  The knock on effect has resulted in Catholic schools without Catholic pupils and even Catholic teaching and management staff.  The solution for The Tablet, of course, is simple:  start focusing on influencing the community rather than educating Catholics.

http://www.thetablet.co.uk

With some schools half (or more) full of non-Catholics, Muslims and other non-Christians, what’s the solution?   It’s never The Tablet solution, that’s for sure.   But what should be done with Catholic schools lacking Catholic pupils, not to mention Catholic staff?

Click on ‘comments’ with your ideas – make ‘em good uns!

Tags: ,

« Older entries