church funds

You are currently browsing the archive for the church funds category.

St Aloysius has organised a special study day on 20th April with the world (in)famous dissenter, Professor Thomas Groome from the Jesuit University, Boston College, U.S.A.

The study day is titled, “To Teach as Jesus Did: Handing on the Faith in the 21st Century”. This day is for priests, teachers and catechists and is being “supported” by the Archdiocese of Glasgow and the Scottish Catholic Education Service, which, we presume, means they’re paying for it using your money. Else, who’s paying for Professor Groome’s flights and accommodation? And the rest?

The cost is £75 so it’s not inexpensive to hand your Faith away – still, the clergy and teachers can afford it.

In the evening Professor Groome will talk in St. Aloysius’ Church at 7.30pm on “What Keeps Us Catholic?”. This lecture is free. At least they’re not charging the rest of us, to rob us of our beloved Catholic Faith.  Something, I suppose…

The irony of the title of Professor Groome’s evening lecture will not be lost on those who understand his systematic and very public dissent from many Church teachings. A dissent which you can read about if you click here

As you’ll have noted, in the link above, Archbishop Pell banned Groome’s books from being used in Catholics schools over there in Aussie-land, and forbade their sale in his churches. No such concerns here, though, since Groome’s books, we’re reliably informed, have been on the shelves of our teacher training college in Glasgow for quite some time.

We urge you to write to Archbishop Conti to complain about this misuse of funds, not to mention his abuse of your trust.  The buck stops with him. It’s his archdiocese.  He has approved this scandal which no doubt includes the use of Church funds to pay for it. We need to probe that (and we will) but there seems little, if any doubt, that “supporting” these scandalous lectures on how to lose the Catholic Faith (or what’s left of it in Glasgow) means that the archdiocese is coughing up the cash.

There are still, incredibly, some parents who send their children to Catholic schools in the expectation that they will be taught the Faith or, minimally, not be given a distorted version of it.  To pay for a man to come from the other end of the world to preach heresy and dissent, or to, in any way whatsoever, “support” his efforts, is to quite deliberately betray that trust. Let us be clear. The ridiculous claim that the archbishop probably doesn’t know about Groome’s dissent, just doesn’t stand up to examination – in that case, he’s in the wrong job:  it’s his duty to know. Everybody else knows. Nobody else is that ignorant. Thank goodness for “everybody” and “nobody” – don’t know where we’d be without them. Whatever which way you look at it, Archbishop Conti is slap, bang, wollop in the middle of the circle where it says “blame”.

Without delay, please write to:

Archbishop Mario Conti, 40 Newlands Road, Glasgow, G43 2JD

And don’t forget to tell him that you will not put another penny in any collection plate in the archdiocese, until you have his personal assurance that this proposed lecture(s) will not take place. The sheer cheek of it.  The brass neck! 

Tags: , ,

A Scots priest contacted us recently to urge discussion on our blog about the forthcoming Ad Limina visit.  He is very keen that the laity write to the Vatican well in advance of the Scottish Bishops’ Ad Limina visit, which is to take place during the first week in February. 

There’s no shortage of problems in the Scottish Church for which the bishops must be held to account.  This thread should serve to remind us all of the many scandals in the Church in Scotland at the present time. Many of them have been debated on this blog – like, for example, the case of the American priest, Father David Cotter, serving in the Diocese of Paisley, who announced on Radio Scotland that he supported the anti-life policies of the then presidential candidate, now President Barack Obama, for whom, Father Cotter cast his vote by post.  Click here to read that thread

Sadly, there are plenty more scandals in the local Church – Fr Cotter’s support for a pro-abortion, pro-gay rights politician whom he helped achieve the most important and powerful governmental post in the world, is but one cog in a very big wheel of dissent and scandal.  

But enough from me – here’s the piece submitted by the Scottish priest who asked for this thread:

In approximately 8 weeks the Scottish Bishops will be going to Rome for an Ad Limina visit, something which normally happens every 5 years but which due to the change of Pope has been 7/8 years since last happening.

At this the bishops will be asked to give an account of themselves, their actions, events in and plans for their Diocese and the Catholic Church in Scotland.

Over recent years, especially the last 2/3/4 years we have repeatedly seen actions by bishops which were not in obedience to Papal instruction/wishes, Roman Curia/Commission’s instruction/directions. Action/s have been taken by individual bishops/the Scottish Bishops Conference which have been disobedient and so failed to be part of the “One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church”.  As a result we’ve witnessed some actions/policies which are clearly schismatic.  Here’s a brief overview of the goings on in the Church in Scotland.

In Glasgow, there was a murder in a Glasgow church.  The priest, if you remember, was giving out rooms in the parish house.   This murder of a young girl in a  Catholic Church made headlines that brought the Scottish Church into disrepute.  Bloggers should send details of this scandal to Rome, enclosing newspaper cuttings if possible.

In  Dundee, the Vicar General had girl friends over a period of 18 years.  Again, national headlines resulted.  Headlines that should be sent to Rome.

In Glasgow there was a negative response to the papal Moto Proprio, Summorum Pontificum, when Archbishop Conti stated that priests ordained after 1970 would not get permission to say the Tridentine Mass; this was outright rejection of the permission Pope Benedict had given to every priest in the world.

In Summorum Pontificum, bishops were told to encourage younger priests to learn the old Latin Mass, help them, so that its beauty and reverence would not be lost to future generations. Has any Scottish bishop done this? So far, one only hears of certain bishops’ deliberate suppression of the old Latin Mass, not their encouragement.  Rome needs to be told that Summorum Pontificum has been mostly ignored in Scotland.

Then there is the increasingly common practice of priests administering the Sacrament of Confirmation instead of the Bishop.  Yet, in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1994 we read:

1313 In the Latin Rite, the ordinary minister of Confirmation is the bishop.

Although the Bishop may for grave reasons concede to priests the faculty of administering Confirmation, it is appropriate from the very meaning of the Sacrament that he should confer it himself, mindful that the celebration of Confirmation has been temporally separated from Baptism for this reason. Bishops are the successors of the apostles. They have received the fullness of the sacrament of Holy Orders. The administration of this sacrament by them demonstrates clearly that its effect is to unite those who receive it more closely to the Church, to her apostolic origins, and to her mission of bearing witness to Christ.

What grave circumstances have there been each year that bishops in certain dioceses confer this sacrament only 3-5 times? But they will go to Ecumenical services more than 5 times over the year!   Rome needs to be told about this.  If your child was ordained by a priest instead of the Bishop, write to tell the authorities in Rome so that they can raise the matter with the Bishops.

In 2000 in Scotus Seminary the Scottish bishops built a chapel. In it was placed a “crucifix”, claimed to be a work of art, which was strands of metal formed together to represent Christ’s body on the cross, naked, which looked like the leftovers from the previous night’s spaghetti bolognaise – it did not in any way show the real suffering and sacrifice of Christ on the Cross for the forgiveness of our sins. This was, in fact, a naked man who had modelled for the “cruciform”.   Students were faced with this “cruciform” every time they entered the chapel. Imagine trying to pray with that naked man hanging above the altar.  Little wonder that the seminary closed.

In this Chapel right up to closure students were discouraged from kneeling in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament, yet from the Year of the Eucharist came clearly the message that we urgently needed to get back to an awareness of the Real Presence, something shown by reverent actions. Again, I say, little wonder that we have no seminary in Scotland.   Remind  Rome of this background to the closure of Scotus.  

The  highly unsuitable, virtually doctrine-free “Alive O” Religious Education curriculum was implemented by the Scottish Bishops Conference late 80s/early 90s while Ireland was waiting for Rome to give approval to it; such approval was never given, in fact the opposite – according to Rome it is not suitable for teaching Catholic pupils and yet the Scottish Bishops have it in our Catholic Schools.  Why?   We need to tell Rome that children in Catholic schools are being denied a solid Catholic education.

Are things so bad here because the papal nuncios are part of the Bishops Club, members of the Magic Circle in the country to which they are posted; not wanting to rock the boat, therefore not reporting matters to Rome which are a betrayal of Catholic Faith/Teaching/Principals?  Ask Rome why the papal nuncios are not passing on the truth about the state of the Church in Scotland.

If Bishops are not acting in obedience to Rome, shouldn’t this be reported by a papal nuncio?  This certainly does not seem to happen in our present times – bishops allowing/advocating masses for homosexual groups to make them feel at ease, where there is no attempt to make clear they must repent and sin no more, is but one present day example in the UK.  Masses for the Quest organization have been held in a Glasgow parish (Ed: we reported this in the newsletter at the time) so this is clearly a scandal that should be reported to Rome.

Within the last 2/3 days we have seen Rome’s/Pope Benedict’s outrage and betrayal, something brought about by Bishops in Ireland not properly and truthfully addressing matters. Why was Benedict/John Paul not informed of such matters?  Unless Rome is kept informed about the reality of the local churches, similar scandals could break out elsewhere, including Scotland.

Rome, must act in an authoritative way when Bishops do not act in unity with the “One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church” but they can only know about these scandals if we tell them.   They seem to think Scotland is in a good condition.  We must correct their misconceptions.

The above are but some issues that you may wish raised and investigated at the Scottish Bishops Ad Limina visit to Rome this February; you may have others of your own. If so they should be raised with/made known to the appropriate congregations/authorities in Rome within the next 3-4 weeks (they will need them by early January so that questions raised may be looked into prior to the February meeting) so bloggers are encouraged to write without delay to the relevant Congregations in  Rome.  END

 Editor:  Click here for the Vatican addresses and get those keyboards working.  Costs very little to post a letter to Rome, so no excuses. 

Click on ‘comments’ to post questions and comments.  If you’d like help with your letter email us via the website and we’ll gladly advise.

The November edition is online today. 
Click here to read the current newsletter

Comments welcome…

Tags: , , ,

U P D A T E – 16th August, 2009 . . .

According to  newspaper reports this weekend, Bishop Devine has not spoken out following the newspaper reports cited in our original report below about the purchase of a home for his housekeeper, due to the fact that he did not want to publicise his expected inheritance.  The house, he explains, is a personal gift to his housekeeper and will, ultimately, be donated to the diocese.  We still don’t recommend donating to diocesan collections (that’s our general position) but, happily, we are pleased to report that while, as the Bishop himself admits, this matter could have been handled more efficiently, we do not believe there to be any likelihood of financial wrongdoing. 
http://www.bellshillspeaker.co.uk/news/Motherwell-bishop-insists-housekeepers-house.5555866.jp 

O R I G I N A L   R E P O R T  (based on newspaper reports plus no rebuttal form the Bishop) . . .

Just when we’re all wondering where the millions from the Faith Into Action project in the Archdiocese of Glasgow have gone, this week’s Scottish newspapers were full of speculation about the Bishop of Motherwell and The Case of his (anything but) Homeless Housekeeper.

http://www.theherald.co.uk/

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk

The question for Catholics these days is, increasingly, should we be putting money into the collection plates?  Shouldn’t we withhold our hard earned cash until there has been the long-awaited clean out and the local Church has returned to what it is supposed to be doing – preaching the Faith and saving souls?

Canon Law requires us to contribute to the support of our pastors.  That means, they shouldn’t starve to death, not that we need to keep them in luxury.

In my novus ordo days, I came to the conclusion that, in conscience, I could not contribute any money that would find its way to the diocese. Too much money is wasted on the wrong things (e.g. top salaries for educationalists who are destroying Catholic schools) so I looked at other ways of fulfilling my duty – such as offering a donation to an individual priest, on the understanding that not one penny of it was passed on to the diocese.   I never had any arguments!

So, what do you think?  Should we be contributing to parish collections at this time, risking the misuse of our hard-earned cash?

Click on ‘comments’ with your views, as and when.

Tags: , , ,

Voices of concern are regularly raised within the Archdiocese of Glasgow about Church accounts. Some years ago there was a scandal surrounding the archdiocesan funds that resulted in the then Archbishop of Glasgow, Thomas Winning,  later Cardinal, authorising compulsory second collections at Mass. Therefore, it would not be wise to ignore the warning signs at this time: so what are these “warning signs”?

Well, first up, around 5 years ago, Archbishop Conti launched his Faith into Action fundraising project which was – he insisted – to fund essential elements in the diocese; it was emphatically not for new building projects. The stated aim was to raise £9 million. In order to achieve this ambitious figure, sales experts were employed to train volunteers in home visitation with the purpose of obtaining financial pledges. One of these volunteers contacted us at the time, appalled at his experience of this “training”.  Hard-sell techniques were used; volunteers understood that leaving a parishioner’s home minus a pledge to donate something, was not a good idea. Not too surprising then, that in no time at all, £7 million had been raised. Precisely what this money has been/is being spent on, is not clear. Maybe you know? If so, click on ‘comments’ to tell the rest of us…

Secondly, the Car Park Project: diocesan owned land behind the Clyde Street offices has been developed to become a public car park, which places the Archdiocese of Glasgow in financial partnership with a commercial car park company. From this car park income, around £300,000 per annum was to be directed to the archdiocesan levy. In practice, this means that parishioners would have to donate £300,000 less – since the “levy” is the amount contributed by each parish to archdiocesan funds.

However, reliable sources tell us, this £300,000 has been re-directed to the Archbishop’s cathedral refurbishment project, which includes new buildings – a cloister and an Italian garden. Yet, the financial support expected from the Italian community, has not materialised, possibly due to the current financial climate. I dare say the Italian community in Glasgow, like the rest of us, is feeling the pinch. The original refurbishment plan included the cathedral house but this has been dropped in order – it seems – to keep the overall cost of the cathedral project within £6.5 million. Over that sum, sources tell us, it would have to be verified by Rome.

We know that building projects seldom, if ever, remain within budget. Archbishop Winning’s 1984 crisis, where the revelation that the archdiocese was around £20 million in debt sent shockwaves through the parishes, means that it is incumbent on us all to take stock of this cathedral project.

Archbishop Conti is due to retire. Should he be tying his successor to such a hugely expensive building project? What if the next Archbishop is Irish or Welsh or, well, Scottish, and doesn’t want an Italian Garden or even a cloister, attached to his cathedral?

And what about the people of Glasgow who remember the previous building project – the Clyde Street offices – which resulted in parishioners having to dip into their pockets not once, but twice at each Mass to help pay off the £20 million debt incurred to build those (I’m told) luxurious offices in which the Ronnie Converys of this world strut their stuff.  Will these second collections return? 

Is it fair to risk leaving Glaswegian Catholics with yet another large debt? Archbishop Conti submitted his resignation on 20th March, 2009. Should he, therefore, be initiating an expensive project such as the cathedral refurbishment, without thought for his successor? And without thought for the dire economic times in which we find ourselves? The Catholic population of Glasgow is ageing. Is it right, is it just, to risk leaving the next generation of Catholics a debt of anything between £8-10 million? What if there IS no “next generation of Catholics”? What can be done? What advice would you give to the parishioners of Glasgow? Click on ‘comments’ now, to share your thoughts.

Tags: , , ,